MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387058223 · doi:10.33137/twpl.v45i1.41684

Nominal linkers in Tati

2023· article· en· W4387058223 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
Sahar Taghipour, Ramin Rahmani

Bibliographic record

VenueToronto Working Papers in Linguistics · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLinguistics and Cultural Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
KeywordsAttributivePossessiveLinguisticsNounHead (geology)Variety (cybernetics)Noun phraseComputer scienceFocus (optics)Genitive caseNatural language processingArtificial intelligenceMathematicsPhilosophyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper describes nominal constructions in the Takestani variety of Southern Tati (Northwestern Iranian). Noun phrases in Tati are head-final. The main focus in this chapter is on constructions involving a nominal linker known as Reverse Ezafe (Stilo 2004). This element appears in possessive and adpositional phrases as well as noun phrases modified by adjectives and nouns. We show that the Reverse Ezafe appearing with possessors and adpositions has different properties than the one appearing on attributive adjectives and nouns. We conclude that Reverse Ezafe in Tati involves two distinct morphosyntactic elements. This conclusion aligns with the pattern of Reverse Ezafe in other Reverse Ezafe languages (i.e., other Caspian languages, Balochi and Sangesari). In this chapter, we further address some of the morpho-phonological constraints on the form and distribution of Reverse Ezafe across the two types.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0050.005
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0000.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueToronto Working Papers in LinguisticsSame topicLinguistics and Cultural StudiesFrench-language works237,207