The Impact of Remittances on Renewable and Non-renewable Energy Consumption in Jamaica
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Using annual data from 1980 to 2019, we explore the impact of remittance inflows (remittances) on renewable and non-renewable energy consumption in Jamaica. We apply statistically adequate vector error correction and vector autoregression models. There are two primary findings. First, we find that an increase in remittances is associated with a decrease in renewable energy consumption within an error correction model, which suggests a long-run negative relationship between remittances and renewable energy consumption. Second, an increase in remittances is associated with an increase in non-renewable energy consumption in the short run; no cointegrating relationship is detected. One implication of our finding is that Jamaica could strengthen policies that encourage the consumption of renewables while discouraging the consumption of non-renewables. These policies should apply to not only remittance-receiving households but also energy consumers in general to enhance the uptake of renewable energy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it