EV Charging Infrastructure Discovery to Contextualize Its Deployment Security
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Electric Vehicle Charging Stations (EVCSs) have been shown to be susceptible to remote exploitation due to manufacturer-induced vulnerabilities, demonstrated by recent attacks on this ecosystem. What is more alarming is that compromising these high-wattage IoT systems can be leveraged to perform coordinated oscillatory load attacks against the power grid which could lead to the instability of this critical infrastructure. In this paper, we investigate a previously sidelined aspect of EVCS security. We analyze the deployment security of EVCSs and highlight operator-induced vulnerabilities rendering the ecosystem exposed to remote intrusions. We create an advanced discovery technique that leverages Web interface artifacts to dynamically discover new charging station vendors. As a result, we uncover 33,320 charging station management systems in the wild. Consequently, we study the deployment security of the charging stations and identify that 28,046 EVCSs were found to be vulnerable to eavesdropping, and around 24% of the studied EVCSs are deployed with default configurations exposing the ecosystem to a Mirai-like attack vector. Aligned with this finding, we discover that the EVCS ecosystem has been targeted by nefarious IoT malware such as Mirai and its variants. This demonstrates that further security measures should be implemented by vendors and operators to ensure the security of this vital ecosystem. Consequently, we provide a comprehensive recommendation for securing the deployment of EVCSs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".