MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387333835 · doi:10.26434/chemrxiv-2023-s5qnw

Anubis: Bayesian optimization with unknown feasibility constraints for scientific experimentation

2023· preprint· en· W4387333835 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueChemRxiv · 2023
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMachine Learning in Materials Science
Canadian institutionsVector InstituteUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBayesian optimizationComputer scienceBenchmarkingBenchmark (surveying)A priori and a posterioriOptimization problemMathematical optimizationFlexibility (engineering)Bayesian probabilityGaussian processMachine learningArtificial intelligenceGaussianAlgorithmMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Model-based optimization strategies, such as Bayesian optimization (BO), have been deployed across the natural sciences in design and discovery campaigns due to their sample efficiency and flexibility. The combination of such strategies with automated laboratory equipment and/or high-performance computing in a suggest-make-measure closed-loop constitutes a self-driving laboratory (SDL), which have been endorsed as a next-generation technology for autonomous scientific experimentation. Despite the promise of early SDL prototypes, a lack of flexible experiment planning algorithms prevents certain prevalent optimization problem types from being addressed. For instance, many experiment planning algorithms are unable to intelligently deal with failed measurements resulting from a priori unknown constraints on the parameter space. Such constraint functions are pervasive in chemistry and materials science research, stemming from unexpected equipment failures, failed/abandoned syntheses, or unstable molecules or materials. In this work, we provide a comprehensive discussion and benchmark of BO strategies to deal with a priori unknown constraints, characterized by learning the constraint function on-the-fly using a variational Gaussian process classifier and combining its predictions with the typical BO regression surrogate to parameterize feasibility-aware acquisition functions. These acquisition functions balance sampling parameter space regions deemed to be promising in terms of optimization objectives with avoidance of regions predicted to be infeasible. In addition to benchmarking feasibility-aware acquisition functions on analytic optimization benchmark surfaces, we conduct two realistic optimization benchmarks derived from previously reported studies: inverse design of hybrid organic-inorganic halide perovskite materials with unknown stability constraints, and the design of BCR-Abl kinase inhibitors with unknown synthetic accessibility constraints. We deliver intuitive recommendations to readers on which strategies work best for various scenarios. Overall, this work contributes to advancing the practicality and efficiency of autonomous experimentation in SDLs. All strategies introduced in this work are implemented as part of the open-source Atlas Python library.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.222
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it