MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387359966 · doi:10.1080/17480272.2023.2265349

A chemistry-based explainable machine learning model based on NIR spectra for predicting wood properties and understanding wavelength selection

2023· article· en· W4387359966 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueWood Material Science and Engineering · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWood Treatment and Properties
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRandom forestSurface roughnessWestern HemlockSpectral lineNear-infrared spectroscopyWavelengthOvertoneTsugaMathematicsSoil scienceBiological systemMachine learningArtificial intelligenceRemote sensingMaterials scienceAnalytical Chemistry (journal)ChemistryComputer scienceEnvironmental scienceComposite materialGeologyBotanyOpticsPhysicsEnvironmental chemistryOptoelectronics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A chemistry-based explainable machine learning (ML) approach was used to predict wood properties using near infrared (NIR) spectral data collected from rough and smooth surfaces, and to provide better understanding of the role of important NIR wavelengths (features) in the performance of ML models. NIR spectra collected from western hemlock (Tsuga heterophylla) and coastal Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) boards with rough and smooth surfaces were fed into random forest and TreeNet; a gradient boosting machine algorithm, for predicting wood density, modulus of elasticity (MOE) and modulus of rupture (MOR). The TreeNet model could predict the MOE, MOR, and density with R2 of 0.66, 0.64, and 0.64 using spectra collected from rough surface and R2 of 0.54, 0.46, and 0.46 using spectra collected from smooth surface. TreeNet outperformed the random forest, and for both ML algorithms higher R2 and lower error were obtained using NIR data collected from rough surfaces. This suggested that for Douglass fir and western hemlock, NIR spectra could be collected on a sawn surface prior to surface planing. However, it is difficult to generalize the impact of surface roughness on the performance of predictive model as different factors (e.g. what constitutes a smooth or rough surface, variability of data set in terms of wood properties) impact the success of predictive models. NIR features having the greatest influence on TreeNet models were examined and consistently had wood chemistry specific band assignments. The most important features occurred in the O-H first overtone, and C–H second overtone regions and a narrow zone (approximately 2400–2500 nm) of the C–H stretch C–C stretch combination region. Important features also differed by property and with surface roughness. Explaining ML model performance using the relative importance of the NIR features showed the importance of wood chemistry related information when developing models, however MOE and MOR TreeNet models based on smooth surface NIR spectra showed an increased importance of water related features. Overall, the chemistry-based explainable machine learning model approach allows for identification of important NIR features, and regions, and aids in understanding how they contribute to the performance of NIR-based wood property predictive models.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.170
Threshold uncertainty score0.679

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.189
Teacher spread0.162 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it