A Novel Federated Learning-Based Smart Power and 3D Trajectory Control for Fairness Optimization in Secure UAV-Assisted MEC Services
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs)-aided mobile-edge computing (MEC) systems face several challenges that hinder their practical implementation. First, the broadcast nature of wireless communications can cause security issues. Second, UAVs have constrained onboard power. Finally, the UAV should be able to serve a maximum number of ground users (GUs). It is also crucial to maintain fairness such that all GUs get equal opportunities to securely offload tasks to UAVs. We seek to address the aforementioned challenges by designing an intelligent mechanism, <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">FairLearn</i> , which maximizes the fairness in secure MEC services by controlling the UAV 3D trajectory, transmission power, and scheduling time for task offloading by mobile GUs. To this end, we formulate a maximization problem and solve it using a <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">deep neural network (DNN)</i> -based model, where the UAVs collaboratively learn the model by utilizing a <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">federated learning (FL)</i> approach. Each UAV uses a <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">reinforcement learning (RL)</i> -based approach to individually generate the training dataset, making the training data span different network scenarios. Our model is based on UAV pairs, where one UAV executes the GUs' offloaded tasks, while the other is a jammer that suppresses eavesdroppers. The simulation evaluation of FairLearn shows that it significantly improves the performance of UAV-enabled MEC systems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it