MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387448055 · doi:10.1109/ojcsys.2023.3322906

Training Reflexes Using Adaptive Feedforward Control

2023· article· en· W4387448055 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Open Journal of Control Systems · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeural dynamics and brain function
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsFeed forwardDisturbance (geology)Computer scienceControl theory (sociology)Control engineeringFeedforward neural networkController (irrigation)Adaptive controlControl (management)Internal modelReflexEngineeringArtificial intelligenceArtificial neural networkNeurosciencePsychologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We consider the problem of mixed feedforward and feedback based disturbance rejection, where the feedforward measurement only provides a partial reconstruction of the disturbance. In doing so, we pose a new biologically relevant disturbance rejection problem which puts the role of feedforward measurements at the forefront. Based on the architecture of the human brain, we propose a design that utilizes an adaptive internal model operating on a fast timescale that, in turn, trains the correct feedforward gains on a slow timescale. As such, the training of reflexes in biological systems can be explained by leveraging the theory of adaptive feedforward control. It is proven that our design provides an arbitrary level of disturbance attenuation, and the benefits of using reflexes are illustrated via a multitude of simulations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.897
Threshold uncertainty score0.611

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.157
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it