Stability Analysis of Tendon Driven Continuum Robots and Application to Active Softening
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tendon driven continuum robots are often considered to navigate through and operate in cluttered environments. While their compliance allows them to conform safely to obstacles, it leads them also to buckle under tendon actuation. In this article, we perform for the first time an extensive elastic stability analysis of these robots for arbitrary planar designs. The buckling phenomena are investigated and analyzed using bifurcation diagrams, complementing the current state of the art and adding new knowledge about robots composed of <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$n$</tex-math></inline-formula> spacer disks. We show the existence of multiple robot configurations with different shapes, achievable with the same actuation inputs. A global stability criterion is also established, which links the critical tendon force, until which the robot is stable to the design parameters. Finally, the buckling phenomena are used to actively soften the robot for a better compromise between compliance and payload. An open loop control strategy is proposed, which can theoretically decrease the stiffness to zero, while maintaining the same robot shape. Experimentally, the robot is made four times more compliant than it is nominally using tendon actuation only.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it