MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387805818 · doi:10.1109/tase.2023.3324526

Observer-Based Event-Triggered Consensus Control of Multi-Agent Systems With Time-Varying Communication Delays

2023· article· en· W4387805818 on OpenAlexafffund
Milad Abbasi, Horacio J. Marquez

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDistributed Control Multi-Agent Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsObserver (physics)ConsensusMulti-agent systemComputer scienceControl theory (sociology)Control (management)Consensus algorithmEvent (particle physics)Control systemControl engineeringEngineeringArtificial intelligenceAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper addresses a new observer-based asynchronous periodic event-triggered control approach for the consensus of linear multi-agent systems (MASs) to reduce the communication load in both sensor to observer (S-O) and controller to actuator (C-A) channels. In order to tackle the time-varying communication delays of the network, each agent uses a bank of observers to estimate the states of its own and its neighbour(s). First, the consensus of a MAS under periodic transmission and time-varying communication delay is analyzed, and the controller and observer gains are designed in terms of the feasibility of certain linear matrix inequalities (LMIs). Then, by using the emulation approach, the event-triggered consensus control problem is converted into the stability of a time-delay system, and by using Lyapunov-Krasovskii approach, a sufficient condition is derived such that the closed-loop system of all agents is stable and the event-triggering parameters are designed. We demonstrate that all agents’ states and observed states converge asymptotically to an agreement point. To illustrate the efficiency of the proposed strategy, a simulation study is performed, and the results show the efficiency of the observer-based ETC in terms of efficient use of communication resources and lower settling time. We have implemented the proposed method and conducted experiments on a real-world MAS consisting of a group of e-puck2 robots. The experimental results demonstrate the efficacy of the proposed method in achieving consensus while efficiently utilizing communication resources.Note to Practitioners—This paper delves into the event-triggered consensus control problem in networked multi-agent systems (MASs), considering time-varying communication delays. The proposed approach holds significant promise for applications in MASs and distributed systems, such as satellite-based communication systems, vehicular networks, swarm robotics, and smart grid control. Since we have considered time-varying delays in both sensor-to-observer and controller-to-actuator channels, this method is applicable in scenarios where the controller and actuator of each agent are physically separated, and sensor and control signals are being transmitted over a network. Moreover, we have significantly reduced the amount of data transmitted over the network through the use of event-triggered control, which is beneficial in applications with limited bandwidth, congested networks, and limited energy supplies. To validate the theoretical results with experimental tests, the proposed method is applied to the a group of robots in the consensus control problem. The same approach can be extended to MASs under more realistic network-induced delays.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations51
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Automation Science and EngineeringSame topicDistributed Control Multi-Agent SystemsFrench-language works237,207