MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387831835 · doi:10.1109/tro.2023.3326318

EVOLVER: Online Learning and Prediction of Disturbances for Robot Control

2023· article· en· W4387831835 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Robotics · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicModel Reduction and Neural Networks
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersBeihang UniversityNatural Science Foundation of Zhejiang ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceController (irrigation)TrajectoryRobotInverse dynamicsAerodynamicsControl theory (sociology)Control engineeringRoboticsMachine learningControl (management)Engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In nature, when encountering unexpected uncertainty, animals tend to react quickly to ensure safety as the top priority, and gradually adapt to it based on recent valuable experience. We present a framework, namely EVOLutionary <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">model-based</i> uncertainty obserVER (EVOLVER), to mimic the bio-behavior for robotics to achieve rapid transient reaction ability and high-precision steady-state performance simultaneously. In particular, the Koopman operator is leveraged to explore the latent structure of internal and external disturbances, which is subsequently utilized in an <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">evolutionary</i> model-based disturbance observer to estimate the eventual disturbance. The resulting observer can guarantee a provable convergence in optimal conditions. Several practical considerations, including construction of a training dataset, data noise handling, and lifting functions selection, are elaborated in pursuit of the theoretical optimality in real applications. The lightweight feature of our framework enables online computation, even on a microprocessor (STM32F7 with 100 Hz control frequency). The framework is thoroughly evaluated by one simulation and three experiments. The experimental scenarios include: 1) Trajectory prediction of an irregular free-flying object subject to aerodynamic drag, 2) indoor and outdoor agile flights of a quadrotor subject to wind gust, and 3) high-precision end-effector control of a manipulator subject to base moving disturbance. Comparison results show that the performance of our proposed EVOLVER is superior to several state-of-the-art model-based and learning-based schemes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.974
Threshold uncertainty score0.357

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it