MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387851056 · doi:10.1504/ijor.2023.134400

Integrated bioethanol-gasoline supply chain evolved by changing US Government policies - model and algorithm

2023· article· en· W4387851056 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Operational Research · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBioeconomy and Sustainability Development
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGasolineSupply chainGovernment (linguistics)BiofuelAlgorithmComputer scienceEnvironmental economicsBusinessOperations researchEconomicsEngineeringWaste managementMarketing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

COVID-19 travel restrictions caused gasoline consumption reduction. Global warming and crude oil dependency had already driven policymakers to make policies to reduce consumption of gasoline. The US had created policies to regulate bioethanol production and blending with gasoline. Although these regulations created opportunities, they also placed new burdens on the obligated parties. The effect of the policy change on the integrated bioethanol-gasoline supply chain (IBGSC) is therefore important for both government and business to study to reduce bankruptcies in current market refineries and bio-refineries. To that end, we extend the IBGSC studied by Ghahremanlou and Kubiak (2020a) to include both first and second generation bioethanol, import and export, and existing infrastructure. We develop a two-stage stochastic programming model. Solving this model leads toward solving NP-hard problems, therefore, we develop an algorithm and overcome the computational complexity. The ELM can be employed to evaluate sustainability of the IBGSC under different policies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.690
Threshold uncertainty score0.222

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it