MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387993744 · doi:10.1145/3623652.3623665

DINAR: Enabling Distribution Agnostic Noise Injection in Machine Learning Hardware

2023· article· en· W4387993744 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceNoise (video)Robustness (evolution)Gaussian noiseEmbedded systemArtificial intelligenceImage (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Machine learning (ML) has seen a major rise in popularity on edge devices in recent years, ranging from IoT devices to self-driving cars. Security in a critical consideration on these platforms. State-of-the-art security-centric ML algorithms (e.g., differentially private ML, adversarial robustness) require noise sampled from Laplace or Gaussian distributions. Edge accelerators lack CPUs [15, 25, 36, 50] to add such noise. Existing hardware approaches to generate noise on-the-fly incur high overheads and leak side-channel information that can undermine security [34, 47]. To remedy this, we propose DINAR,1 lightweight hardware that enables noise addition from arbitrary distributions. For differentially private ML, DINAR enables noise addition while incurring 23 × lower area and 40 × lower energy compared to producing noise directly on-chip.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.923
Threshold uncertainty score0.652

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it