Real-Time Detection and Identification of Suspects in Forensic Imagery Using Advanced YOLOv8 Object Recognition Models
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Rapid advancements in artificial intelligence, machine learning, deep learning, coupled with easy access to high-capacity processing hardware, expansive organized datasets, and the evolution of artificial intelligence algorithms, have extensively influenced numerous fields. Digital Forensics is one such discipline where the application of artificial intelligence has been significantly amplified in recent years. The analysis of extensive image and video files derived from forensic evidence presents challenges in terms of time efficiency and accuracy. To surmount these challenges, artificial intelligence models can be employed to perform identification and classification processes on these data, thus expediting the resolution of forensic cases with enhanced precision. In the current study, state-of-the-art pre-trained YOLOv8 object recognition models - nano, small, medium, large, and extra-large - were utilized. These models were trained on the Wider-Face dataset with the objective of identifying suspects from images and videos sourced from digital materials in the field of digital forensics. The models achieved mean Average Precision (mAP) values of 97.513%, 98.569%, 98.763%, 98.775%, and 99.032% respectively. The YOLOv8 architecture demonstrated superior performance, outperforming the YOLOv5 architecture by a margin of 7.1% to 8.8%. To aid digital forensic experts in the detection and identification of suspicious individuals, a desktop application capable of real-time image analysis was developed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it