Designing architectured ceramics for transient thermal applications using finite element and deep learning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Topologically interlocking architectures have demonstrated the potential to create durable ceramics with desirable thermo-mechanical properties. However, designing such materials poses challenges due to the intricate design space, rendering traditional modeling approaches ineffective and impractical. This paper presents a novel approach to designing high-performance architectured ceramics by integrating machine learning (ML) techniques and finite element analysis (FEA) data. The design space of interlocked architectured ceramics encompasses tiles with varying angles and sizes. The study considers three configurations 3 × 3 , 5 × 5 , and 7 × 7 arrays of tiles with five sets of interlocking angles ( 5 ∘ , 10 ∘ , 15 ∘ , 20 ∘ , a n d 25 ∘ ) . By training ML models, specifically convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and multilayer perceptrons (MLPs) using FEA simulation data, we establish correlations between architectural parameters and thermo-mechanical characteristics. A grid comprising all possible designs was generated to predict high-performance architectured ceramics. This grid was then fed into the networks that were trained using results from the FEA simulation. The predicted results for all possible interpolated designs are utilized to determine the optimal structure among the configurations. The goal is to identify the optimal interlocked ceramics that minimize the out-of-plane deformation for thermal shielding and maximize heat absorption for heat sink applications. To validate the performance of the outcomes, FEA simulations were conducted on the best predictions obtained from both the MLP and CNN algorithms. Despite the limited amount of available simulation data, our networks demonstrate effectiveness in predicting the transient thermo-mechanical responses of potential panel designs. Notably, the optimal design predicted by CNN led to ≈ 30 % improvement in edge temperature.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".