MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388195143 · doi:10.1088/1361-651x/ad073a

Designing architectured ceramics for transient thermal applications using finite element and deep learning

2023· article· en· W4388195143 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueModelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTopology Optimization in Engineering
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council CanadaWestern University
FundersFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologiesNational Research Council CanadaCompute CanadaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research ChairsMcGill University
KeywordsAlgorithmMaterials scienceArtificial intelligenceCeramicMachine learningComputer scienceComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Topologically interlocking architectures have demonstrated the potential to create durable ceramics with desirable thermo-mechanical properties. However, designing such materials poses challenges due to the intricate design space, rendering traditional modeling approaches ineffective and impractical. This paper presents a novel approach to designing high-performance architectured ceramics by integrating machine learning (ML) techniques and finite element analysis (FEA) data. The design space of interlocked architectured ceramics encompasses tiles with varying angles and sizes. The study considers three configurations <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mn>3</mml:mn> <mml:mo>×</mml:mo> <mml:mn>3</mml:mn> </mml:math> , <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mn>5</mml:mn> <mml:mo>×</mml:mo> <mml:mn>5</mml:mn> </mml:math> , and <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mn>7</mml:mn> <mml:mo>×</mml:mo> <mml:mn>7</mml:mn> </mml:math> arrays of tiles with five sets of interlocking angles <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:msup> <mml:mn>5</mml:mn> <mml:mo>∘</mml:mo> </mml:msup> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:msup> <mml:mn>10</mml:mn> <mml:mo>∘</mml:mo> </mml:msup> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:msup> <mml:mn>15</mml:mn> <mml:mo>∘</mml:mo> </mml:msup> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:msup> <mml:mn>20</mml:mn> <mml:mo>∘</mml:mo> </mml:msup> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">n</mml:mi> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:msup> <mml:mn>25</mml:mn> <mml:mo>∘</mml:mo> </mml:msup> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> </mml:math> . By training ML models, specifically convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and multilayer perceptrons (MLPs) using FEA simulation data, we establish correlations between architectural parameters and thermo-mechanical characteristics. A grid comprising all possible designs was generated to predict high-performance architectured ceramics. This grid was then fed into the networks that were trained using results from the FEA simulation. The predicted results for all possible interpolated designs are utilized to determine the optimal structure among the configurations. The goal is to identify the optimal interlocked ceramics that minimize the out-of-plane deformation for thermal shielding and maximize heat absorption for heat sink applications. To validate the performance of the outcomes, FEA simulations were conducted on the best predictions obtained from both the MLP and CNN algorithms. Despite the limited amount of available simulation data, our networks demonstrate effectiveness in predicting the transient thermo-mechanical responses of potential panel designs. Notably, the optimal design predicted by CNN led to <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mo>≈</mml:mo> <mml:mn>30</mml:mn> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi> </mml:math> improvement in edge temperature.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.505
Threshold uncertainty score0.573

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it