MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388205527 · doi:10.51731/cjht.2023.768

Interventions Intended to Alleviate Emergency Department Overcrowding

2023· article· en· W4388205527 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Health Technologies · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEmergency and Acute Care Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOvercrowdingEmergency departmentPsychological interventionMedicineHealth careMedical emergencyNursingPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Why Is This an Issue? Emergency department (ED) overcrowding is a known issue in Canada that puts patients’ lives and health at risk when treatment needs within the ED exceed the resources required to address them. The causes and consequences of ED overcrowding are complex, varied, and extend beyond the ED. Left unchecked, ED overcrowding contributes to a deteriorating standard of care as staff become overworked and burned out. What Are the Potential Interventions to Address ED Overcrowding? This roundup of 87 new and emerging interventions intended to alleviated ED overcrowding complements CADTH’s Emergency Department Overcrowding: An Environmental Scan of Contributing Factors and a Summary of Systematic Review Evidence on Interventions. Interventions were included in this report if they are not captured in CADTH’s complimentary report Emergency Department Overcrowding: An Environmental Scan of Contributing Factors and a Summary of Systematic Review Evidence on Interventions because they are either new or are not yet in wide use in EDs and health systems across Canada and could be reasonably be expected to affect ED overcrowding (e.g., by improving patient flow through the ED or reducing the number of people seeking care in the ED). Interventions that could address multiple causal factors (e.g., e-consult services) were also included. What Is the Potential Impact? Decreasing ED overcrowding has the potential to improve the standard of care delivered to those accessing EDs and contribute to decreasing the burden on ED staff, regardless of the intervention or which contributing factor it aims to act upon. Some interventions that can alleviate ED overcrowding also have an impact on primary and community care; bolstering preventive care, increasing access to diagnostic testing for those who need it, and improving access to health care supports can improve health outcomes. What Else Do We Need to Know? The pan-Canadian issue of ED overcrowding calls for real solutions. CADTH is examining the evidence and expert-informed considerations and producing a series of publications about the causes and consequences of, and solutions to, ED overcrowding in health care systems across the country. The interventions identified in this report may be of interest to senior health care decision-makers who are anticipating health system innovation and transformation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.469
Threshold uncertainty score0.395

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.079
GPT teacher head0.379
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it