Continuous Critical Respiratory Parameter Measurements Using a Single Low-Cost Relative Humidity Sensor: Evaluation Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Accurate and portable respiratory parameter measurements are critical for properly managing chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases (COPDs) such as asthma or sleep apnea, as well as controlling ventilation for patients in intensive care units, during surgical procedures, or when using a positive airway pressure device for sleep apnea. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this research is to develop a new nonprescription portable measurement device that utilizes relative humidity sensors (RHS) to accurately measure key respiratory parameters at a cost that is approximately 10 times less than the industry standard. METHODS: We present the development, implementation, and assessment of a wearable respiratory measurement device using the commercial Bosch BME280 RHS. In the initial stage, the RHS was connected to the pneumotach (PNT) gold standard device via its external connector to gather breathing metrics. Data collection was facilitated using the Arduino platform with a Bluetooth Low Energy connection, and all measurements were taken in real time without any additional data processing. The device's efficacy was tested with 7 participants (5 men and 2 women), all in good health. In the subsequent phase, we specifically focused on comparing breathing cycle and respiratory rate measurements and determining the tidal volume by calculating the region between inhalation and exhalation peaks. Each participant's data were recorded over a span of 15 minutes. After the experiment, detailed statistical analysis was conducted using ANOVA and Bland-Altman to examine the accuracy and efficiency of our wearable device compared with the traditional methods. RESULTS: The perfused air measured with the respiratory monitor enables clinicians to evaluate the absolute value of the tidal volume during ventilation of a patient. In contrast, directly connecting our RHS device to the surgical mask facilitates continuous lung volume monitoring. The results of the 1-way ANOVA showed high P values of .68 for respiratory volume and .89 for respiratory rate, which indicate that the group averages with the PNT standard are equivalent to those with our RHS platform, within the error margins of a typical instrument. Furthermore, analysis utilizing the Bland-Altman statistical method revealed a small bias of 0.03 with limits of agreement (LoAs) of -0.25 and 0.33. The RR bias was 0.018, and the LoAs were -1.89 and 1.89. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the encouraging results, we conclude that our proposed design can be a viable, low-cost wearable medical device for pulmonary parametric measurement to prevent and predict the progression of pulmonary diseases. We believe that this will encourage the research community to investigate the application of RHS for monitoring the pulmonary health of individuals.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".