MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388305433 · doi:10.1353/tech.2023.a911036

Rare Merit: Women in Photography in Canada, 1840–1940 by Colleen Skidmore (review)

2023· article· en· W4388305433 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueTechnology and Culture · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicPhotography and Visual Culture
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhotographyArt historyStudioArchaeologySociologyArtVisual artsHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Rare Merit: Women in Photography in Canada, 1840–1940 by Colleen Skidmore Siobhan Angus (bio) Rare Merit: Women in Photography in Canada, 1840–1940 By Colleen Skidmore. Vancouver: UBC Press, 2022. Pp. 352. It was the summer of 1841 when the American daguerreotypist Mrs. Fletcher made history as the first woman to open a professional photography studio in either North America or Britain. Somewhat surprisingly, this groundbreaking moment happened in the small town of Pictou, Nova Scotia. In Rare Merit, Colleen Skidmore tracks the scant archival traces of Fletcher's peripatetic practice to Quebec City, Montreal, and Charleston, South Carolina, before Fletcher vanishes from the historical record. Fletcher's story opens Rare Merit and skillfully articulates Skidmore's main thesis: women's histories are central to the medium, and women played a significant role in the development of Canadian photography. It also establishes the important role women played in photographic industries and technological change and places an emphasis on regional histories. Building on Laura Jones's landmark study of female photographers in Canada, Skidmore centers gender as the key analytic, joining Naomi Rosenblum's global survey, A History of Women Photographers (1995), and Peter Palmquist's North American–focused Camera Fiends and Kodak Girls (1989), as well as work on Canada by Susan Close, Joan Schwartz, and Carol Williams. Skidmore traces how women made use of ever-changing photographic technologies, and in turn, how women were limited by social mores and the structural constraints of gender and class. The first three chapters demonstrate the strength of Skidmore's approach, which weaves together social, labor, and technological histories. Chapter 1 focuses on daguerreotypes before chapter 2 turns to the negative/positive process for works on paper, spotlighting the Livernois Studio (1854–74), founded by Élise Livernois in Quebec City. Contesting other histories that emphasize the role of Livernois's husband, Skidmore highlights Livernois's central role in the business, including working behind the camera. The Livernois Studio was the only one to rival the scale of William Notman's Montreal-based studio, which is the focus of chapter 3. Addressing the rise of industrial-scale manufacturing, Skidmore tracks working-class women, who did both skilled (printing room, darkroom, retouching) and unskilled (sales, reception, dressing room) work. The paucity of the archival record is deftly addressed through Skidmore's painstaking reconstruction of women's labor. Drawing on prints, payroll books, studio day albums, newspapers, and the Canadian census, she establishes a comprehensive survey of female photographers working in Canada between 1840 and 1940. In chapters 4 and 5, Skidmore turns to the fraught intersections of gender and settler colonialism through the case studies of Hannah Maynard and Geraldine Moodie. Skidmore acknowledges that both photographers operated [End Page 1347] within a fundamentally European way of seeing the world, conceding that, in the case of Maynard, her work was "not unusual, not unique, and not 'resistant' or anti-colonial" (p. 91). For Skidmore, this "Eurocentrism" is in part a technological problem embedded in the medium itself. Photography is "irredeemably mediated by the lenses and chemicals of the process to retain a European visual sensibility," such as the way the camera imposes linear perspective (p. 90). Curiously, in this analysis of camera technology and coloniality, Skidmore cites Laura Mulvey's feminist work on the gaze but does not directly engage with postcolonial or Indigenous scholarship. The Inuvialuk artist and critic Jade Nasogaluk Carpenter is cited in chapter 5, but generally, Skidmore focuses on gender at the occlusion of deeper considerations of race and ethnicity. In part, this is because Skidmore deploys the framework of the nation rather than that of settler colonialism, which has been at the center of much recent scholarship in Canadian photo studies. Rare Merit analyzes fascinating objects that show how photography reinforced settler colonialism. For instance, Skidmore reads Maynard's Gems of British Columbia—a series of unsettling composite photographs of (white) babies and children—as asserting the important role of women in nation building. Throughout these two chapters, however, Skidmore's voice is less confident, and the conclusions are less direct. Without a deeper engagement with settler colonial or Indigenous studies, an opportunity to complicate this reading of...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.694
Threshold uncertainty score0.935

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it