MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388305486 · doi:10.1353/tech.2023.a911017

The Architecture of Steam: Waterworks and the Victorian Sanitary Crisis by James Douet (review)

2023· article· en· W4388305486 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueTechnology and Culture · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistory of Science and Medicine
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDemiseArchitectureEconomic historyWater supplyHistoryIndustrialisationPolitical scienceArchaeologyEngineeringLawEnvironmental engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: The Architecture of Steam: Waterworks and the Victorian Sanitary Crisis by James Douet Tom Crook (bio) The Architecture of Steam: Waterworks and the Victorian Sanitary Crisis By James Douet. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press for Historic England, 2023. Pp. 176. James Douet's The Architecture of Steam is a richly illustrated and admiring account of the rise and demise of steam-powered waterworks over the course of the long nineteenth century. We remember them today principally for enabling the mass supply of clean drinking water and facilitating the introduction of waterborne sewage systems. Douet is right to celebrate their contribution to solving the Victorian sanitary crisis and [End Page 1310] overcoming the appalling epidemiological consequences of rampant urbanization and industrialization. The figures are striking. By the 1870s, Mancunians were consuming six times more water per day (some 33 gallons) than their forebears had in the 1840s. By the late 1860s, those who inhabited the wealthier parts of London were consuming about 39 gallons—which is roughly what we enjoy in the United Kingdom today (p. 87). A crucial part of this history, and the one that has attracted the most attention from historians, is the gradual assumption of municipal ownership. The great exception was London, where the water supply remained in the hands of private companies until 1903. Other towns and cities, by contrast, began taking charge from the 1830s, among them Manchester, Leeds, and Glasgow in the 1850s. The question of ownership is by no means peripheral to Douet's account, and he is keenly aware of the struggles endured by local authorities to take control. Legal and financial difficulties meant that it took Wolverhampton's council more than a decade to secure ownership of the Wolverhampton Water Company, established in 1845; the process began in 1855 and ended only in 1867 (pp. 41–43). Douet, however, is primarily interested in two other aspects of the waterworks, both of which are explored in tandem over eight chronologically arranged chapters. One of these is the architecture of waterworks and how they became not just the most emblematic buildings of a burgeoning water industry but important civic monuments. Public or private, they participated fully in the eclectic architectural historicism of the Victorian period (chs. 4 and 6, especially). Early works, such as the Grand Junction Company's complex at Kew Bridge, London (1838), embraced neoclassical designs. Later ones were housed in a variety of gothic exteriors, for example Nottingham's Bestwood works (1871) and Birmingham's Whiteacre complex (1872–84). All were imposing, proud buildings. As Douet notes, by the 1880s they had come to enjoy the same status as more conventional expressions of civic pride, such as public baths, libraries, schools, and hospitals (p. 97). The other aspect Douet explores is the technical intricacies of waterworks and how they combined a variety of engineering innovations. Chief among these was the incorporation of steam-powered pumping technologies first pioneered in collieries, starting with Newcomen's original invention in the eighteenth century. Douet dwells at length on the ways evolving steam technologies (e.g., the improved engine of Watt and, later, the Cornish engine) were combined with water abstraction, gravel filtering, and high-level storage to form the core elements of Victorian waterworks, highlighting the contribution of three engineers in particular: Thomas Wicksteed, James Simpson, and Thomas Hawksley (ch. 2). There were spillover gains, too; having enabled the mass production of waterborne sewage, steam-powered pumping helped with its disposal. The most visible features of Joseph Bazalgette's gargantuan main drainage scheme for London (largely completed during the 1860s) were four magnificent sewage pumping stations. Each raised the city's sewage [End Page 1311] sufficiently high so that it could once again secure the necessary gravitational traction to flow toward the two outfall works situated at Crossness and Barking (pp. 76–86). Neither of these aspects of the water industry has received sustained scrutiny, still less together within the confines of a single, compact volume such as Douet's. But readers will also welcome the periodic excursions it makes beyond Britain. The book is littered with fascinating detours to innovations and variations in cities such as Montreal, Paris, Hamburg, Chicago, and...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.780
Threshold uncertainty score0.768

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it