A Data Discovery and Visualization Tool for Visual Analytics of Time Series in Digital Agriculture
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the current era of big data, huge volumes of data can be easily generated and collected at a high velocity from a wide variety of rich data sources. Embedded in these big data-which may also contain many labels or tags-are implicit, previously unknown and potential useful information that can be discovered. Discovered knowledge helps user get a better understanding of the data. However, amounts of discovered knowledge from these huge volumes of big data can also be large. To help users comprehend the discovered knowledge, visualization approaches are in demand. In this paper, we present a data discovery and visualization tool. The tool enables users to visually monitor and explore multi-sourced, multi-tagged time-series data. It also enables users to conduct visual analytics to discover interesting data/knowledge and to visualize this information. Although we demonstrate the practicality of our tool for multi-sourced, multi-tagged time-series data from the agricultural sector, our tool can be applicable to a wide variety of other domains.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it