Coding for the Gaussian Channel in the Finite Blocklength Regime Using a CNN-Autoencoder
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The development of delay-sensitive applications that require ultra high reliability created an additional challenge for wireless networks. This led to Ultra-Reliable Low-Latency Communications, as a use case that 5G and beyond 5G systems must support. However, supporting low latency communications requires the use of short codes, while attaining vanishing frame error probability (FEP) requires long codes. Thus, developing codes for the finite blocklength regime (FBR) achieving certain reliability requirements is necessary. This paper investigates the potential of Convolutional Neural Networks autoencoders (CNN-AE) in approaching the theoretical maximum achievable rate over a Gaussian channel for a range of signal-to-noise ratios at a fixed blocklength and target FEP, which is a different perspective compared to existing works that explore the use of CNNs from bit-error and symbol-error rate perspectives. We explain the studied CNN-AE architecture, evaluate it numerically, and compare it to the theoretical maximum achievable rate and the achievable rates of polar coded quadrature amplitude modulation (QAM), Reed-Muller coded QAM, multilevel polar coded modulation, and a TurboAE-MOD scheme from the literature. Numerical results show that the CNN-AE outperforms these benchmark schemes and approaches the theoretical maximum rate, demonstrating the capability of CNN-AEs in learning good codes for delay-constrained applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".