Block-Invariant Symmetry Shift: Preprocessing Technique for Second-Quantized Hamiltonians to Improve Their Decompositions to Linear Combination of Unitaries
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Computational cost of energy estimation for molecular electronic Hamiltonians via quantum phase estimation (QPE) grows with the difference between the largest and smallest eigenvalues of the Hamiltonian. In this work, we propose a preprocessing procedure that reduces the norm of the Hamiltonian without changing its eigenspectrum for the target states of a particular symmetry. The new procedure, block-invariant symmetry shift (BLISS), builds an operator T̂ such that the cost of implementing H ^ − T ^ is reduced compared to that of Ĥ, yet H ^ − T ^ acts on the subspaces of interest the same way as Ĥ does. BLISS performance is demonstrated for a linear combination of unitaries (LCU)-based QPE approaches on a set of small molecules. Using the number of electrons as the symmetry specifying the target set of states, BLISS provided a factor of 2 reduction of 1-norm for several LCU decompositions compared to their unshifted versions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".