MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388520051 · doi:10.1109/ojvt.2023.3331185

Machine Learning-Based Self-Interference Cancellation for Full-Duplex Radio: Approaches, Open Challenges, and Future Research Directions

2023· article· en· W4388520051 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Open Journal of Vehicular Technology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFull-Duplex Wireless Communications
Canadian institutionsHuawei Technologies (Canada)Memorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceSingle antenna interference cancellationWirelessInterference (communication)Computer engineeringElectronic engineeringKey (lock)Spectral efficiencyOverhead (engineering)Duplex (building)Open researchComputational complexity theoryTelecommunicationsEngineeringAlgorithmChannel (broadcasting)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In contrast to the long-held belief that wireless systems can only work in half-duplex mode, full-duplex (FD) systems are able to concurrently transmit and receive information over the same frequency bands to theoretically enable a twofold increase in spectral efficiency. Despite their significant potential, FD systems suffer from an inherent self-interference (SI) due to a coupling of the transmit signal to its own FD receive chain. Self-interference cancellation (SIC) techniques are the key enablers for realizing the FD operation, and they could be implemented in the propagation, analog, and/or digital domains. Particularly, digital domain cancellation is typically performed using model-driven approaches, which have proven to be insufficient to seize the growing complexity of forthcoming communication systems. For the time being, machine learning (ML) data-driven approaches have been introduced for digital SIC to overcome the complexity hurdles of traditional methods. This paper reviews and summarizes the recent advances in applying ML to SIC in FD systems. Further, it analyzes the performance of various ML approaches using different performance metrics, such as the achieved SIC, training overhead, memory storage, and computational complexity. Finally, this paper discusses the challenges of applying ML-based techniques to SIC, highlights their potential solutions, and provides a guide for future research directions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.262
Threshold uncertainty score0.724

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.118
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it