LSTM Prediction and Portfolio Optimization for Artificial Intelligence Industry
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The launch of ChatGPT has overwhelmingly been revolutionizing the stock market. Of particular interests of stock traders and financial analysts, discovery about artificial intelligence stock market has become the main focus. The paper selected top worldwide artificial intelligence (AI) enterprises from Yahoo Finance and made future return forecasts with the long short-term memory networks (LSTM). The predicted information is employed in conducting portfolio optimization within the scope of mean-variance analysis to obtain an assessment of the portfolio’s performance. The outcomes illustrate that the utilization of the LSTM model exhibits aptness in forecasting the forthcoming returns of financial instruments. Furthermore, a favorable preference entails the inclusion of NVDIA and Microsoft stocks in the portfolio. These discoveries offer utility in proposing pioneering investment strategies and aligning with the prevailing tendencies of societal progression.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it