Learning of viscosity functions in rarefied gas flows with physics-informed neural networks
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The prediction of non-equilibrium transport phenomena in disordered media is a difficult problem for conventional numerical methods . An example of a challenging problem is the prediction of gas flow fields through porous media in the rarefied regime, where resolving the six-dimensional Boltzmann equation or its numerical approximations is computationally too demanding. A generalized Stokes phenomenological model using an effective viscosity function was used to recover rarefied gas flow fields: however, it is difficult to construct the effective viscosity function on first principles. Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) show some potential for solving such an inverse problem. In this work, PINNs are employed to predict the velocity field of a rarefied gas flow in a slit at increasing Knudsen numbers according to a generalized Stokes phenomenological model using an effective viscosity function. We found that the AdamW is by far the best optimizer for this inverse problem. The design was found to be robust from Knudsen numbers ranging from 0.1 to 10. Our findings stand as a first step towards the use of PINNs to investigate the dynamics of non-equilibrium flows in complex geometries.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it