Symbolic Synthesis of Clifford Circuits and Beyond
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Path sums are a convenient symbolic formalism for quantum operations with applications to the simulation, optimization, and verification of quantum protocols.Unlike quantum circuits, path sums are not limited to unitary operations, but can express arbitrary linear ones.Two problems, therefore, naturally arise in the study of path sums: the unitarity problem and the extraction problem.The former is the problem of deciding whether a given path sum represents a unitary operator.The latter is the problem of constructing a quantum circuit, given a path sum promised to represent a unitary operator.In this paper, we show that the unitarity problem is co-NP-hard in general, but that it is in P when restricted to Clifford path sums.We then provide an algorithm to synthesize a Clifford circuit from a unitary Clifford path sum.The circuits produced by our extraction algorithm are of the form C 1 HC 2 , where C 1 and C 2 are Hadamard-free circuits and H is a layer of Hadamard gates.We also provide a heuristic generalization of our extraction algorithm to arbitrary path sums.While this algorithm is not guaranteed to succeed, it often succeeds and typically produces natural looking circuits.Alongside applications to the optimization and decompilation of quantum circuits, we demonstrate the capability of our algorithm by synthesizing the standard quantum Fourier transform directly from a path sum.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it