MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388699823 · doi:10.1515/jisys-2022-0270

Anomaly detection for maritime navigation based on probability density function of error of reconstruction

2023· article· en· W4388699823 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Intelligent Systems · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAnomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsAnomaly detectionComputer scienceAnomaly (physics)Probability density functionTrajectoryArtificial intelligenceFeature (linguistics)Function (biology)Pattern recognition (psychology)SIGNAL (programming language)Unsupervised learningSeries (stratigraphy)Machine learningData miningMathematicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Anomaly detection is a fundamental problem in data science and is one of the highly studied topics in machine learning. This problem has been addressed in different contexts and domains. This article investigates anomalous data within time series data in the maritime sector. Since there is no annotated dataset for this purpose, in this study, we apply an unsupervised approach. Our method benefits from the unsupervised learning feature of autoencoders. We utilize the reconstruction error as a signal for anomaly detection. For this purpose, we estimate the probability density function of the reconstruction error and find different levels of abnormality based on statistical attributes of the density of error. Our results demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach for localizing irregular patterns in the trajectory of vessel movements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.702
Threshold uncertainty score0.326

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it