Profile reduction of folded transmitarray antenna using multiple feeders
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract In this paper, we introduce a novel design for a high-gain, low-profile quad-feed folded transmitarray antenna (FTA) to enable a more compact system. The proposed antenna system consists of a transmitarray, a reflectarray, and four identical planar microstrip U-slot patch antennas placed on the same surface of the reflectarray with an adjacent distance greater than 1 λ . To compare the effectiveness of our design, we developed three different antenna array systems with the same aperture size: a single-feed transmitarray antenna (TA) system, the proposed quad-feed FTA system, and a single-feed FTA system. Our experimental results demonstrate that employing four symmetrical feeders with an adjacent distance of 3.2 λ effectively reduces the height by about 76.7 % in comparison to the height of a single-feed TA, and by 30 % when compared to the height of a single-feed FTA. We also present the design, fabrication, and testing of a prototype of the proposed quad-feed FTA operating in the Ku-band. The measured results of the prototype confirm the effectiveness of our design.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".