MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388904308 · doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2023.10.926

Reciprocal Safety Velocity Cones for Decentralized Collision Avoidance in Multi-Agent Systems

2023· article· en· W4388904308 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIFAC-PapersOnLine · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDistributed Control Multi-Agent Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec en Outaouais
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCollision avoidanceWorkspaceRange (aeronautics)CollisionControl theory (sociology)Computer scienceReciprocalDecentralised systemEuclidean spaceMulti-agent systemDistributed computingAlgorithmMathematical optimizationControl (management)RobotArtificial intelligenceMathematicsEngineeringMathematical analysisAerospace engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we solve the inter-agent collision avoidance problem in an arbitrary n-dimensional Euclidean space using reciprocal safety velocity cones (RSVCs). We propose a decentralized feedback control strategy that guarantees simultaneously asymptotic stabilization to a reference and collision avoidance. Our algorithm is purely decentralized in the sense that each agent uses only local information about its neighbouring agents. Moreover, the proposed solution can be implemented using only inter-agent bearing measurements. Therefore, the algorithm is a sensor-based control strategy which is practically implementable using a wide range of sensors such as vision systems and range scanners. Simulation results in a two dimensional environment cluttered with agents shows that the number of possible deadlocks is marginal and decrease with the decrease in the clutteredness of the workspace.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.588
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it