Strengthening Sustainable Development Goals – SDG 9 Concerning Flooding in Malaysia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), commonly known as the Global Goals, were approved by the United Nations in 2015 as an international call to eradicate poverty, safeguard the environment, and guarantee that by 2030, everyone may live in peace and prosperity. The 17 SDGs are interconnected; they acknowledge that actions in one area will impact others and that sustainable development must balance social, economic, and environmental sustainability. SDG 9 aims to develop resilient infrastructure, advance sustainable industry, and support innovation. This is because economies with a diverse industrial sector and resilient infrastructure suffered less harm and recovered faster. Malaysia experiences flood disasters more frequently than any other ASEAN nation, coming in second after Indonesia. According to a special report on flood impact in Malaysia by the Department of Statistics, overall losses for public assets and infrastructure recorded Rm 2 billion in 2021 and Rm 232.7 million in 2022. Hence, this data reveals that public assets and infrastructure record the highest losses due to flood occurrences in Malaysia. The paper identifies the resilient infrastructure currently existing in Malaysia in response to flooding. The research implements a qualitative approach by examining secondary sources such as studies, print, and online sources. In addition, open-ended questionnaires were used to interview key stakeholders to better understand the situation. This study summarizes that flood-resilient infrastructures require further implementation to safeguard people and the environment. Given the frequency and severity of flooding in Malaysia, it is necessary to concentrate more on SDG 9. Further research is recommended to explore the issues in the implementation of SDG 9 in Malaysia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".