The Role of Whey Supplementation on Sensation Seeking, Parent-child Relationship, Family Communication, Anger and Sex Desire Among Athletes, Athletes Using Whey and Normal Population
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this research was to examine the role of Whey protein in inducing changes in sensation-seeking, parent-child relationships, family relationships, anger, and sexual desire among regular male athletes, supplement-consuming athletes, and ordinary men in the city of Isfahan. The study population included regular athletes, supplement consumers, and ordinary men in Isfahan. The research method was causal-comparative. The sample size consisted of 30 individuals per group, with the Whey consuming group selected through convenience sampling, and the other two groups were matched and chosen accordingly. The instruments used included scales for family relationships; attachment to parents; sensation-seeking; anger expression, and sexual desire. The research data were analyzed using descriptive statistics (mean and standard deviation) and inferential statistics (multivariate analysis of covariance) through SPSS software, version 23. The results indicated that the three groups did not significantly differ in the research variables. Thus, it can be stated that Whey protein does not play a significant role in creating changes in the psychological and family-related variables mentioned in the studied groups.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".