MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The Effect of Service Quality on Customer Complaints and Customer Loyalty Through Customer Satisfaction of ZALORA Indonesia E-commerce Website Users

2023· article· en· W4389102996 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Khairani Ratnasari Siregar, Ikhsan Fachrurrozi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicConsumer Behavior and Marketing Influence
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNonprobability samplingCustomer satisfactionService qualityData collectionLoyalty business modelThe InternetLoyaltyQuarter (Canadian coin)BusinessSoftwareQuality (philosophy)Sample (material)E-commerceService (business)Reliability (semiconductor)Computer scienceMarketingWorld Wide WebPower (physics)StatisticsMathematicsPopulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Indonesia has one of the world's highest concentrations of internet users. Internet can be utilized for various activities, one of which is doing business. E- commerce website visits in Indonesia have increased since the third quarter of 2019 to the second quarter of 2022. ZALORA Indonesia is one of the e-commerce websites in Indonesia that has been present since 2012. The purpose of this research is to look at the impact of service quality on customer complaints and customer loyalty for ZALORA Indonesia e-commerce website customers. The method used is a quantitative method with a causal approach. This research sample collection uses purposive non- probability sampling techniques. The data collection technique used is distributing questionnaires using Google Form which is then tested for validity and reliability using SPSS version 25 software, and data processing is carried out to obtain the expected results using SmartPLS software. The help of using G-Power software to determine the number of samples that must be obtained.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicConsumer Behavior and Marketing InfluenceFrench-language works237,207