MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389127364 · doi:10.5151/2594-5327-14798

EFFECT OF RARE EARTH OXIDE GEL CHARACTERISTICS ON HIGH TEMPERATURE OXIDATION BEHAVIOR OF IRON-CHROMIUM ALLOYS

2009· article· en· W4389127364 on OpenAlexaff
S.M.C. Fernandes, Olandir Vercíno Corrêa, L.V. Ramanathan

Bibliographic record

VenueABM Proceedings · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHigh-Temperature Coating Behaviors
Canadian institutionsGeneral Dynamics (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChromiumOxideMaterials scienceAlloyLayer (electronics)Rare earthCrystalliteMetallurgyChemical engineeringThermal oxidationAdhesionInorganic chemistryComposite materialChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PDF | The influence of various rare earth (RE) oxide gels - La2O3, CeO2, Pr2O3, Nd2O3, Sm2O3, Gd2O3, Dy2O3, Y2O3, Er2O3, and Yb2O3 - on cyclic oxidation behavior in the range RT- 900oC of Fe20Cr alloys has been studied. This paper presents the effect of rare earth oxide gel characteristics such as morphology, coverage and crystallite size on oxidation behavior of the alloy. These characteristics varied with the type of rare earth. Overall, the oxidation resistance increased with increase in time at temperature required to reach a specific chromium dioxide layer thickness and this was influenced by both the rare earth ion radius as well as the oxide gel characteristics. The latter affected the adhesion and resistance to thermal and growth stresses in the chromium dioxide layer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueABM ProceedingsSame topicHigh-Temperature Coating BehaviorsFrench-language works237,207