MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389140568 · doi:10.1115/pvp2023-105832

PRCI Burst Pressure Model Modernization and Performance

2023· article· en· W4389140568 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Integrity and Reliability Analysis
Canadian institutionsStantec (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCharpy impact testFracture toughnessFracture mechanicsToughnessStress corrosion crackingPipeline transportStructural engineeringComputer scienceMaterials scienceEngineeringMechanical engineeringCorrosionComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The Pipeline Research Council International (PRCI) contracted development and deployment of a burst pressure prediction fracture mechanics model in 2001, embodied in the CorLAS™ V2.0 software. Since that time, many North American operators have made this model an integral part of their integrity management processes with excellent track records for both effectiveness and efficiency. Even though the PRCI burst model originally targeted pipe body stress corrosion cracking, operators have found the model performs equally well for discrete crack-like features associated with long seam welds, and highly versatile in estimating burst pressures of irregularly shaped crack-likes reported by both in-line inspection tools and field non-destructive evaluations. The question is: can application of the model evolve to address emerging threats and trends? As the pipeline industry transitions away from Charpy V-Notch energy as a low fidelity fracture toughness surrogate, Enbridge has repackaged the PRCI burst model to accept K toughness directly, and referred to as KorLAS herein to denote K input built on legacy CorLAS™ equations and empiricism. KorLAS performance over the tested range of flaw dimensions, pipe steel toughness, wall thicknesses, crack morphology, and crack shape are assessed and compared to test and forensic data. The pipeline industry has emerging technologies which are able to detect, size, and report selective seam weld corrosion (SSWC) features. The predicted burst pressures of SSWC features have historically been difficult to predict. A reasonable and prudent tailored KorLAS input method to assess SSWC fitness for service is presented. KorLAS performance at lower toughness has been difficult to validate or judge due to the scarcity of available test data. Test data now made available to the public allows tentative envelope expansion down to about the 10th percentile toughness observed in North American vintage line pipe. Although cold welds can be problematic to detect, KorLAS performance in assessment of cold welds is evaluated against available test data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.184

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it