CT-Fire: a CNN-Transformer for wildfire classification on ground and aerial images
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Wildfires pose a serious threat to the environment, ecosystems, property, biodiversity, and human life. Early detection of wildland fires is crucial for effective firefighting and mitigation. In this paper, we propose an ensemble learning method, called CT-Fire, which combines the deep CNN RegNetY and the vision transformer EfficientFormer v2 to recognize and detect forest fires on ground and aerial images. Testing results showed that CT-Fire achieved excellent performance with fast speed and accuracy of 99.62% and 87.77% using ground and aerial images, respectively. CT-Fire also outperformed benchmark CNNs and vision transformer methods, showing its accurate reliability in detecting wildfires. It also surpassed various challenges, including the detection of very small wildfires, background complexity, image quality, and wildland fire variability in terms of intensity, size, and shape.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it