A framework for modeling, generating, simulating, and predicting carbon dioxide dispersion indoors using cell-DEVS and deep learning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Carbon dioxide concentration in enclosed spaces is an air quality indicator that affects occupants’ well-being. To maintain healthy carbon dioxide levels indoors, enclosed space settings must be adjusted to maximize air quality while minimizing energy consumption. Studying the effect of these settings on carbon dioxide concentration levels is not feasible through physical experimentation and data collection. This problem can be solved by using validated simulation models, generating indoor settings scenarios, simulating those scenarios, and studying results. In previous work, we presented a formal Cellular Discrete Event System Specifications simulation model for studying carbon dioxide dispersion in rooms with various settings. However, designers may need to predict the results of altering large combinations of settings on air quality. Generating and simulating multiple scenarios with different combinations of space settings to test their effect on indoor air quality is time-consuming. In this research, we solve the two problems of the lack of ground truth data and the inefficiency of producing and studying simulation results for many combinations of settings by proposing a novel framework. The framework utilizes a Cellular Discrete Event System Specifications model, simulates different scenarios of enclosed spaces with various settings, and collects simulation results to form a data set to train a deep neural network. Without needing to generate all possible scenarios, the trained deep neural network is used to predict unknown settings of the closed space when other settings are altered. The framework facilitates configuring enclosed spaces to enhance air quality. We illustrate the framework uses through a case study.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".