AUTOMATIC GENERATION OF ROUTING GRAPHS FOR INDOOR-OUTDOOR TRANSITIONAL SPACE TO SUPPORT SEAMLESS NAVIGATION
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract. With the fast development of urbanization, the complexity of built environments has dramatically increased, driving a need for assistance in seamless indoor-outdoor navigation. This requires integration of spatial information of indoor and outdoor environments from heterogeneous data sources. While outdoor road network data is largely available from many sources (such as OpenStreetMap), indoor spatial information is either inexistent or is inconsistently represented using several different standards. Among these standards, IndoorGML is a well-developed standard with the focus on indoor location-based services. This standard has already been accepted by Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC) and is now under active development. Although in IndoorGML some mechanisms have been defined to enable integration of indoor and outdoor networks, there is still a lack of concrete guidelines for determination of indoor-outdoor connections. It also lacks solid scientific foundations and efficient tools to extract the connecting nodes and edges that link indoor and outdoor spaces. To address this gap, in this study we focus on the connection of indoor and outdoor spaces and aim to provide a tool, which can automatically construct navigation graphs of the indoor-outdoor transitional space to support seamless integration of indoor-outdoor navigation. To this end, voxel-based modeling approaches are used to model the connecting space between indoor and outdoor environments. Based on Python, we develop the intended tool, which can generate voxel models from point clouds, identify navigable space by taking into account the characteristics of agents (such as pedestrians, wheelchairs, and vehicles), and automatically build navigation graphs linking IndoorGML networks with outdoor street networks. It is expected that the methodology and tools developed from this project will benefit the IndoorGML ecosystem and greatly advance the capability of IndoorGML in representing navigable space to support location-based services.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".