Admission Total Leukocyte Count as a Predictor of Mortality in Cardiac Intensive Care Unit Patients
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Inflammation is a sequela of cardiovascular critical illness and a risk factor for mortality. This study aimed to evaluate the association between white blood cell count (WBC) and mortality in a broad population of patients admitted to the cardiac intensive care unit (CICU). This retrospective cohort study included patients admitted to the Mayo Clinic CICU between 2007 and 2018. We analyzed WBC as a continuous variable and then categorized WBC as low (<4.0 × 103/mL), normal (≥4.0 to <11.0 × 103/mL), high (≥11.0 to <22.0 × 103/mL), or very high (≥22.0 × 103/mL). The association between WBC and in-hospital mortality was evaluated using multivariable logistic regression and random forest models. We included 11,699 patients with a median age of 69.3 years (37.6% females). Median WBC was 9.6 (IQR: 7.4-12.7). Mortality was higher in the low (10.5%), high (12.0%), and very high (33.3%) WBC groups relative to the normal WBC group (5.3%). A rising WBC was incrementally associated with higher in-hospital mortality after adjustment (AICc adjusted OR: 1.03 [95% CI: 1.02-1.04] per 1 × 103 increase in WBC). After adjustment, only the high (AICc adjusted OR: 1.37 [95% CI: 1.15-1.64]) and very high (AICc adjusted OR: 1.99 [1.47-2.71]) WBC groups remained associated with increased risk of in-hospital mortality. Leukocytosis is associated with an increased mortality risk in a diverse cohort of CICU patients. This readily available marker of systemic inflammation may be useful for risk stratification within the increasingly complex CICU patient population.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".