MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389624679 · doi:10.1080/23744731.2023.2290976

Deployment of real-time building automation system-integrated inverse-model-based fault detection and diagnostics algorithms

2023· article· en· W4389624679 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueScience and Technology for the Built Environment · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBuilding Energy and Comfort Optimization
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsSoftware deploymentFault detection and isolationAutomationComputer scienceAlgorithmReliability engineeringReal-time computingEngineeringSystems engineeringArtificial intelligenceSoftware engineeringMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The complex operation of HVAC systems in large commercial buildings warrants regular implementation of advanced analytical approaches to operations and maintenance, and subsequent corrective measures to improve and maintain optimal energy performance. Despite the established capabilities of data-driven fault detection and diagnostics (FDD) to identify suboptimal controls policies and mechanical faults resulting in poor energy performance, few attempts have been made to deploy scalable solutions around these approaches. Furthermore, real-time BAS-integrated FDD methods are predominantly rule-based, offering limited insights to faults with gradual negative impacts to energy performance. This paper demonstrates the application of various established data-driven, inverse-model-based FDD methodologies in a BAS-integrated environment. Traditionally implemented sparingly, the novelty of recursive and automatic execution of advanced FDD methodologies, facilitated through a direct data pipeline to an existing BAS, capitalizes on the BAS’s real-time monitoring capabilities to enable continuously refreshed inverse model generation that can capture the gradual degradation of building performance, and provide up-to-date actionable visualizations and key performance indicators (KPI) to building operators. Since deployment, the application has successfully identified a scheduling fault on two separate occasions in a case study building in Ottawa, Canada, and the visualizations were presented to the building operators who resolved the issues.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.358
Threshold uncertainty score0.280

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it