MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389675231 · doi:10.1145/3637490

Principal Component Approximation Network for Image Compression

2023· article· en· W4389675231 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing Communications and Applications · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Data Compression Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImage compressionComputationComputer sciencePrincipal component analysisImage (mathematics)Feature (linguistics)ENCODESet (abstract data type)Compression (physics)Artificial intelligencePattern recognition (psychology)Data compressionComponent (thermodynamics)AlgorithmImage processing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this work, we propose a novel principal component approximation network (PCANet) for image compression. The proposed network is based on the assumption that a set of images can be decomposed into several shared feature matrices, and an image can be reconstructed by the weighted sum of these matrices. The proposed PCANet is specifically devised to learn and approximate these feature matrices and weight vectors, which are used to encode images for compression. Unlike previous deep learning-based methods, a distinctive aspect of our approach is its consideration of network size in the bit-rate computation. Despite this inclusion, our proposed method yields promising results. Through extensive experiments conducted on standard datasets, we demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach in comparison to state-of-the-art techniques. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first machine learning approach that includes the size of networks during bitrate computation in image compression.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.966
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0030.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it