Intelligent and Decentralized Resource Allocation in Vehicular Edge Computing Networks
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With the rise of intelligent transportation systems and the increasing diversity of vehicular applications, such as safety-related features, parking navigation, and multimedia applications, vehicular edge computing has garnered significant attention. However, managing task offloading efficiently to meet the demands of various tasks remains a fundamental research challenge due to the workload dynamics at multi-access edge computing (MEC) and the unpredictable arrival of tasks. To tackle these challenges, this work proposes a task offloading algorithm for a dynamic vehicular network based on task priority. We introduce a new resource allocation problem to ensure critical tasks meet their response time requirements. The algorithm utilizes Multivariate Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) to develop an intelligent workload prediction for each MEC node. Additionally, we employ distributed deep reinforcement learning to enhance the efficiency and accuracy of the proactive resource allocation algorithm. Extensive numerical analysis and results demonstrate that our proposed algorithm can significantly increase the ratio of accepted critical tasks. Overall, our task offloading algorithm can effectively manage resources and meet the demands of various tasks in a dynamic vehicular network.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it