Digitality and the Reconfigured Global Archive(s) of Forced Migration
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Movement has always been a part of the human and, by association, of the archival experience. Recent work on displacement by anthropologists and archival studies scholars has highlighted the interdependencies between both phenomena. The current era of global connectivity is simultaneously experiencing unprecedented levels of displacement and mass migration, that together have combined to create whole new and often unexpected forms of and uses for global archives. Previously locally situated communities, practices and stories have literally gone global. Original locales, especially if destroyed or inaccessible, are being reconstituted by globally dispersed translocal and virtual networks of people originating in or relating to a specific place who use these networks to document, preserve, or recover their memories, experiences, and communities. This chapter draws upon the authors’ fieldwork to tell the stories, and contemplate the nature, possibilities, and affects of such global archives for those who have been displaced.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it