MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389991737 · doi:10.5206/mase/16723

Recovery of an initial temperature of a one-dimensional body from finite time-observations

2023· article· en· W4389991737 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematics in Applied Sciences and Engineering · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicNumerical methods in inverse problems
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersIndiana University East
KeywordsBounded functionBoundary (topology)Interval (graph theory)Neumann boundary conditionMathematicsInverseDirichlet distributionMathematical analysisBoundary value problemDirichlet boundary conditionInverse problemCombinatoricsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Under the Dirichlet boundary setting, Aryal and Karki (2022) studied an inverse problem of recovering an initial temperature profile from known temperature measurements at a fixed location of a one-dimensional body and at linearly growing finitely many later times within a bounded interval. This paper studies the problem under the Neumann boundary conditions. That is, under this boundary setting, we suitably select a fixed location x0 on the body of length π and construct finitely many times tk, k = 1, 2, 3, . . . , n that grow linearly with k and are in [0, T] such that from the temperature measurements taken at x0 and at these n times, we recover the initial temperature profile f(x) with a desired accuracy, provided f is in a suitable subset of L2[0, π].

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.724
Threshold uncertainty score0.427

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.089
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it