MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389998928 · doi:10.18280/mmep.100642

Enhancing Privacy Protection in Online Federated Learning: A Method for Secure Face Image De-Identification Using a Modified Diffie-Hellman Algorithm

2023· article· en· W4389998928 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematical Modelling and Engineering Problems · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicFace recognition and analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIdentification (biology)Computer scienceImage (mathematics)AlgorithmFace (sociological concept)Privacy protectionDiffie–Hellman key exchangeComputer securityArtificial intelligenceEncryptionSociologyPublic-key cryptographyKey exchange

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The proliferation of face images, alongside their widespread dissemination and easy accessibility through social media, underscores a pressing challenge to personal identification information protection.Conversely, advancements in identity-agnostic computer vision technologies offer valuable benefits, necessitating cautious utilization of face images to safeguard individual privacy.'Face de-identification', or 'face anonymization', refers to the process of altering an original face image to a nearidentical one that obscures the subject's actual identity.Existing de-identification strategies, despite considerable efforts, often fall short in photo-realism or fail to strike an optimal balance between privacy and utility.This study proposes an approach for generating de-identified facial images using instances, addressing the potential privacy breaches and identity exposure associated with facial features.The proposed system involves a two-stage training process.Initially, a federated learning framework is suggested, enabling knowledge amalgamation through the mutual exchange of model parameters among clients during federated training, devoid of data sharing.Subsequently, sensitive information is secured using an enhanced version of the Diffie-Hellman algorithm coupled with a genetic algorithm.In the event of data loss or corruption, an optimized genetic algorithm (OGA) is employed to successfully restore the data, thereby offering protection against potential insider threats in federated learning.The decryption process is then executed as if the user had initiated the request.Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed federated learning approach delivers performance equivalent to centralized learning, thereby validating the practicality and effectiveness of the suggested architecture.Specifically, a model of the federated learning-deep convolutional neural network (FL-DCNN) achieved an accuracy of 95.2%, precision and F1-score of 95%, recall of 96%, and a final specificity of 96.80%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.229
Threshold uncertainty score0.611

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it