MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Determinan Skor Pola Pangan Harapan di Indonesia Tahun 2022

2023· article· id· W4390022567 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSeminar Nasional Official Statistics · 2023
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFood Security and Socioeconomic Dynamics
Canadian institutionsWiLAN (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsForestryPhysicsGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tujuan kedua Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) salah satunya mencakup perbaikan nutrisi untuk mengatasi kasus kelaparan yang banyak terjadi di dunia. Pemenuhan kebutuhan nutrisi dapat diperoleh dengan melakukan diversifikasi terhadap pangan. Di Indonesia, keragaman pangan digambarkan dengan skor Pola Pangan Harapan (PPH). Pada tahun 2022, skor PPH mengalami lonjakan yang substansial dibandingkan tahun sebelumnya yaitu sebesar 5,7 poin. Tujuan penelitian ini untuk menganalisis faktor-faktor yang memengaruhi Skor PPH dan kondisi keragaman pangan. Metode yang digunakan adalah analisis klaster dengan algoritma Bicluster CC dan regresi linear berganda. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan terdapat dua pengelompokkan wilayah di Indonesia yang terbagi menjadi wilayah dengan keragaman pangan tinggi di lima provinsi di Pulau Jawa dan wilayah dengan keragaman pangan yang rendah. Analisis yang telah dilakukan juga memperlihatkan adanya efek yang positif dari pengeluaran per kapita dan angka partisipasi sekolah terhadap skor PPH.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.659
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it