MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390050685 · doi:10.1287/ijoc.2022.0263

Supervised ML for Solving the <i>GI</i>/<i>GI</i>/1 Queue

2023· article· en· W4390050685 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueINFORMS journal on computing · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicAdvanced Queuing Theory Analysis
Canadian institutionsYork UniversityUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQueueQueueing theoryComputer scienceRange (aeronautics)Stationary distributionArtificial neural networkDistribution (mathematics)Service (business)Sample (material)Operations researchArtificial intelligenceAlgorithmMathematicsMachine learningEngineeringComputer network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We apply supervised learning to a general problem in queueing theory: using a neural net, we develop a fast and accurate predictor of the stationary system-length distribution of a GI/GI/1 queue—a fundamental queueing model for which no analytical solutions are available. To this end, we must overcome three main challenges: (i) generating a large library of training instances that cover a wide range of arbitrary interarrival and service time distributions, (ii) labeling the training instances, and (iii) providing continuous arrival and service distributions as inputs to the neural net. To overcome (i), we develop an algorithm to sample phase-type interarrival and service time distributions with complex transition structures. We demonstrate that our distribution-generating algorithm indeed covers a wide range of possible positive-valued distributions. For (ii), we label our training instances via quasi-birth-and-death(QBD) that was used to approximate PH/PH/1 (with phase-type arrival and service process) as labels for the training data. For (iii), we find that using only the first five moments of both the interarrival and service times distribution as inputs is sufficient to train the neural net. Our empirical results show that our neural model can estimate the stationary behavior of the GI/GI/1—far exceeding other available methods in terms of both accuracy and runtimes. History: Ram Ramesh, Area Editor for Data Science and Machine Learning. Funding: O. Baron received financial support from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NERC) [Grant 458051]. D. Krass received financial support from the NERC [Grant 458395]. Supplemental Material: The software that supports the findings of this study is available within the paper and its Supplemental Information ( https://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/suppl/10.1287/ijoc.2022.0263 ) as well as from the IJOC GitHub software repository ( https://github.com/INFORMSJoC/2022.0263 ). The complete IJOC Software and Data Repository is available at https://informsjoc.github.io/ .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.294
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it