Multitimescale Control and Communications With Deep Reinforcement Learning—Part II: Control-Aware Radio Resource Allocation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In Part I of this two-part paper (Multitimescale Control and Communications with deep reinforcement learning (DRL)—Part I: Communication-Aware Vehicle Control), we decomposed the multitimescale control and communications (MTCCs) problem in cellular vehicle-to-everything (C-V2X) system into a communication-aware DRL-based platoon control (PC) subproblem and a control-aware DRL-based radio resource allocation (RRA) subproblem. We focused on the PC subproblem and proposed the MTCC-PC algorithm to learn an optimal PC policy given an RRA policy. In this article (Part II), we first focus on the RRA subproblem in MTCC assuming a PC policy is given, and propose the MTCC-RRA algorithm to learn the RRA policy. Specifically, we incorporate the PC advantage function in the RRA reward function, which quantifies the amount of PC performance degradation caused by observation delay. Moreover, we augment the state space of RRA with PC action history for a more well-informed RRA policy. In addition, we utilize reward shaping and reward backpropagation prioritized experience replay (RBPER) techniques to efficiently tackle the multiagent and sparse reward problems, respectively. Finally, a sample- and computational-efficient training approach is proposed to jointly learn the PC and RRA policies in an iterative process. In order to verify the effectiveness of the proposed MTCC algorithm, we performed experiments using real driving data for the leading vehicle, where the performance of MTCC is compared with those of the baseline DRL algorithms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".