MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390528645 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2401.00322

Ergodic properties of Kantorovich operators

2023· preprint· en· W4390528645 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenuearXiv (Cornell University) · 2023
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicApproximation Theory and Sequence Spaces
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsErgodic theoryMathematicsPure mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Kantorovich operators are non-linear extensions of Markov operators and are omnipresent in several branches of mathematical analysis. The asymptotic behaviour of their iterates plays an important role even in classical ergodic, potential and probability theories, which are normally concerned with linear Markovian operators, semi-groups, and resolvents. The Kantorovich operators that appear implicitly in these cases, though non-linear, are all positively 1-homogenous. General Kantorovich operators amount to assigning "a cost" to most operations on measures and functions normally conducted "for free" in these classical settings. Motivated by extensions of the Monge-Kantorovich duality in mass transport, the stochastic counterpart of Aubry-Mather theory for Lagrangian systems, weak KAM theory à la Fathi-Mather, and ergodic optimization of dynamical systems, we study the asymptotic properties of general Kantorovich operators.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.239
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.011 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it