Enhancing The Accuracy of Image Classification Using Deep Learning and Preprocessing Methods
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Deep learning is one of many methods in Artificial Intelligence (AI) that computers can use to process information like text, images, and audio. This manuscript will be focusing on image preprocessing, one of the many different techniques that are used to modify the neural network model training process, and how it affects the training speed and accuracy of the neural network. Six different image preprocessing techniques were picked for use in this study: Grayscale, Smoothing, Unmask Sharpening, Laplacian and Equalization, and Random Cropping and Rotation all of which were implemented using Python and the libraries NumPy, OpenCV, and PyTorch. For the dataset, a batch of 10000 images from the CIFAR10 dataset were used to train the model. This study explored the impact of preprocessing techniques on a deep learning model, employing the RESNET50 architecture. Notable improvements in model accuracy were observed, particularly with normalization and random cropping accompanied by rotation. The efficiency gains attributed to preprocessing were highlighted, leading to a more rapid training process and significant resource savings. This research underscores the importance of thoughtful preprocessing in enhancing the performance of deep learning models, offering valuable insights for practitioners in imageclassification tasks.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".