MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390556018 · doi:10.5114/ms.2023.134082

Haemorrhagic complications of femoral artery pseudoaneurysms caused by interventional cardiology procedures – a large-population retrospective study

2023· article· en· W4390556018 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueMedical Studies · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVascular Procedures and Complications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineFemoral arteryRetrospective cohort studyInterventional cardiologyPopulationInternal medicineSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction For many years femoral access was the preferred approach in interventional cardiology. Still, due to its large size, which allows for the use of larger catheters, the femoral artery remains the preferred access for many procedures. Femoral pseudoaneurysms are the most common and most severe complication of this access. Aim of the research To evaluate haemorrhagic complications of femoral pseudoaneurysms induced by interventional cardiology procedures. Material and methods From the patients treated with percutaneous intervention between 2006 and 2022 in the Second Department of Cardiology, Świętokrzyskie Cardiology Centre, Kielce, Poland, we registered and analysed 621 cases of femoral pseudoaneurysms. Of these patients, 537 had their haemoglobin tested before and after the procedure, and they constitute the population thoroughly analysed in the study. Results and conclusions The occurrence of a pseudoaneurysm statistically significantly increased the chance of any decrease in haemoglobin (HGB) (OR = 3.26, 95% CI: 2.26–4.7, p < 0.0001), as well as a decrease in HGB by more than one unit (OR = 6.34, 95% CI: 4.87–8.26, p < 0.0001), a decrease in HGB by more than 2 units (OR = 7.54, 95% CI: 5.18–10.96, p < 0.0001), or a decrease in HGB by more than 3 units (OR = 20.31, 95% CI: 9.35–44.1, p < 0.0001). Among patients who had any decrease in HGB after the procedure, significantly greater average decreases were observed in the group of patients with a pseudoaneurysm. Men were significantly more likely to be anaemic before the procedure. Among the patients with femoral pseudoaneurysm whose HGB levels dropped the most after percutaneous intervention, STEMI was the most common primary condition. The occurrence of a pseudoaneurysm significantly increased the risk of anaemia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.059
Threshold uncertainty score0.509

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.358
Teacher spread0.313 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it