Oracle Based Privacy-Preserving Cross-Domain Authentication Scheme
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) system is the cornerstone of today's security communications. All users in the service domain covered by the same PKI system are able to authenticate each other before exchanging messages. However, there is identity isolation in different domains, making the identity of users in different domains cannot be recognized by PKI systems in other domains. To achieve cross-domain authentication, the consortium blockchain system is leveraged in the existing schemes. Unfortunately, the consortium blockchain-based authentication schemes have the following challenges: high cost, privacy concerns, scalability and economic unsustainability. To solve these challenges, we propose a scalable and privacy-preserving cross-domain authentication scheme called Bifrost-Auth. Firstly, Bifrost-Auth is designed to use a decentralized oracle to directly interact with blockchains in different domains instead of maintaining a consortium blockchain and enables mutual authentication for users lying in different domains. Secondly, users can succinctly authenticate their membership of the domain by the accumulator technique, where the membership proof is turned into zero knowledge to protect users' privacy. Finally, Bifrost-Auth is proven to be secure against various attacks, and thorough experiments are carried out and demonstrate the security and efficiency of Bifrost-Auth.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it